Last updated
When you think about employee mentoring, does this sound familiar? Fourteen pairs. One kick-off email. A spreadsheet with names in two columns and a third for notes that nobody ever filled in.
Six weeks later, four pairs had met once. The rest had moved a calendar invitation twice and let it expire. Ask anyone involved and you will hear about diaries, workloads, the restructure that landed in week three. All true. None of it the reason.
Workplace mentoring is a developmental relationship in which one colleague helps another progress, drawing on experience rather than authority. Accurate, and almost no use at all in explaining why fourteen pairs never met.
An employee mentoring programme is what turns that into something an organisation can actually run - who gets matched with whom, on what basis, for how long, and how anyone will know whether it worked.
The programmes still going after eight years are not the ones with more committed people in them. They are the ones where somebody answered those questions before sending the kick-off email.
On this page
What workplace mentoring is, and what it is not | Why employee mentoring works | The types of workplace mentoring programme | What running a mentoring programme involves | How to start a mentoring programme at work | How to mentor an employee well | Measuring a mentoring programme | Common questions about workplace mentoring | Where to start
What workplace mentoring is, and what it is not
The distinction that causes most confusion is between mentoring and coaching. A coach works on a defined capability, often to a defined timescale, and does not need to have done the mentee's job. A mentor has usually walked some version of the same road, and the relationship is broader and slower as a result. The two are complementary rather than interchangeable, and the difference between coaching and mentoring matters most when you are deciding which one your organisation actually needs.
The second distinction is quieter but more important. A line manager is accountable for your output. A mentor is not. That absence of accountability is what allows a mentee to say the thing they would never put in a development review - that they are out of their depth, that they are considering leaving, that they do not understand something everyone assumes they understand. Mentoring works because of what the mentor cannot do to you.
One point of vocabulary, since both appear in job adverts and policy documents: mentoring generally describes the activity and mentorship the relationship, though the two are used interchangeably often enough that nothing turns on it.
Back to the top
Why employee mentoring works
The business case usually gets made in the language of retention and engagement, and the numbers there are real enough. But the mechanism underneath is simpler: mentoring moves knowledge that no process can capture.
Every organisation carries a layer of understanding that exists only in people's heads. How a decision really gets made. Which relationships matter. What the last three attempts at this taught the people who were there. None of it is written down, most of it is not writeable, and all of it walks out of the building when someone leaves.
What mentoring does is give that knowledge somewhere to go. It is also one of the few development interventions that pays both parties - mentors consistently report that articulating their own reasoning sharpens it. The business benefits of a mentoring programme compound from there: progression, engagement, and a visible reason for good people to stay.
Which raises the harder question. Does it work in practice, in real organisations, at scale?
Across five mentoring programmes run on the PLD platform - spanning professional bodies, the NHS, engineering and corporate partnerships - between 73% and 99% of mentees found a suitable match. Those are not projections. They are the reported outcomes of live programmes, measured by the organisations running them.
alta, Royal Aeronautical Society
The women-only mentoring programme run by the Royal Aeronautical Society has supported hundreds of women across aviation and aerospace. 99% of participants said their match was a good one. The programme won the ESRC Outstanding Business and Enterprise Impact Award in 2022.
Back to the top
The types of workplace mentoring programme
Most organisations reach for the traditional model by default - senior mentor, junior mentee, career development. It is a reasonable starting point and it is not the only one. Choosing the wrong shape is one of the more common reasons a programme underperforms, because the structure quietly determines who volunteers.
| Type | How it works | Best suited to |
|---|---|---|
| Career mentoring | Experienced colleague supports a less experienced one over months or years | Progression, retention, developing a pipeline |
| Reverse mentoring | A junior colleague mentors a senior one, usually on lived experience or emerging practice | Inclusion work, leadership insight, closing generational gaps |
| Peer mentoring | Colleagues at similar levels support each other | Flat structures, professional communities, cross-team knowledge |
| Group mentoring | One mentor works with several mentees together | Scarce mentors, shared challenges, building cohort identity |
| Flash mentoring | A single conversation, or a very short series | Low-commitment entry points, specific questions, busy populations |
Nothing stops an organisation running more than one. The different types of mentoring serve different populations, and reverse mentoring in particular tends to work best when it sits alongside a conventional programme rather than replacing it.
They do need to be set up separately, though. A reverse mentoring relationship has a different power dynamic, different matching criteria and a different sense of what good looks like. Running it through the same configuration as a career programme is how you end up with two programmes that both half-work.
East London NHS Foundation Trust
ELFT runs mentoring, coaching and reverse mentoring across mental health, community health and primary care services. Each programme is configured as its own environment, with its own matching logic and its own reporting - which is what allows the reverse mentoring strand to serve equality and inclusion work without being bent into the shape of a career programme.
Back to the top
What running a mentoring programme involves
The honest version: recruitment, matching, preparation, and then a long stretch of quiet maintenance that nobody warns you about.
Recruitment is where most programmes lose their first tranche of goodwill, and it is almost always the mentor side that fails. Twenty mentees and eight mentors means twelve people whose first experience of your programme is being told to wait. Recruit mentors first, and recruit more than you think you need.
Matching is where the real work is. Doing it by hand is feasible at fifteen pairs and unmanageable at a hundred and fifty, which is why so many programmes plateau at exactly the point they start succeeding. Seniority and department are the obvious criteria and the least useful ones. What actually predicts a working relationship:
Development goals - what the mentee is trying to get to, stated before matching rather than discovered in meeting three
Specific skills and experience - held on one side, wanted on the other
Availability and location - the most boring criterion and the one that quietly kills the most pairings
Communication preference - video, in person, written; a mismatch here reads as disinterest
Language - decisive in international programmes and routinely forgotten in domestic ones
Reporting and professional conflicts - anyone in the mentee's management chain, or holding a competing professional interest, is excluded before matching rather than after
Matching on skills rather than availability produces measurably better relationships - but only if the criteria come from the programme's purpose. A diversity programme and a knowledge-transfer programme need different inputs, and a generic matching form will serve neither well.
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
With more than 49,000 members, IOSH needed matching that did not depend on someone knowing both parties. Their Member Engagement Manager describes skill-based matching as taking the guesswork out of the process, and producing more fruitful relationships as a result.
Preparation is the step most often skipped. A mentor who has never mentored will default to advice-giving, which is the single most reliable way to make a mentee stop booking meetings. An hour of guidance before the first conversation changes the trajectory of the entire relationship.
Then maintenance. Someone has to notice that a pair has not met in two months, and do something about it. In a programme of thirty, that person can hold it in their head. In a programme of three hundred, they cannot, and the programme decays invisibly until an annual survey tells you it has.
PLD's mentoring platform handles matching, guided journeys, in-platform meetings and reporting, so programme managers can see which relationships are progressing and which have stalled - without chasing. See how the platform works.
Back to the top
How to start a mentoring programme at work
Start with the question that determines everything else: what would have to change for this to have been worth doing?
A programme built to improve retention among early-career staff looks nothing like one built to move technical knowledge ahead of a retirement wave, which in turn looks nothing like one built to widen the pipeline into senior roles. Same activity, three different designs. Organisations that skip this step build the generic version and then struggle to explain, a year later, whether it worked.
From there, in order:
Define the population. Not everyone. A defined group with a shared reason to be there gives you a coherent matching pool and a measurable outcome.
Recruit mentors first. Then open mentee registration once you know you can serve it.
Set the criteria that matching will run on. These come from your purpose, not from a template.
Prepare both sides. Short, practical, and mandatory. What the first meeting covers, what good looks like, how to end it.
Agree a cadence and a duration. Every four to six weeks, over six to twelve months, suits most career mentoring. Consistency matters more than frequency, and an open-ended relationship with no review point tends to end by fading rather than finishing.
Build in the review. Decide now what you will measure, because retrofitting evaluation onto a running programme is considerably harder than it sounds.
Expect the first cohort to be slower than you planned. There is more detail in our guides to designing a mentoring programme and setting one up, and it is worth understanding why mentoring programmes fail before you commit to a design.
NHS Clinical Entrepreneur Programme
The world's largest entrepreneurial training programme in healthcare, delivered by Anglia Ruskin University for NHS England, matched mentors manually before moving to a platform. The team describe the previous process as time-consuming and laborious, and the transition as quick and easy - with a site licence rather than per-user pricing, which for a network of that size was the deciding factor.
Back to the top
How to mentor an employee well
The most common mistake is the most understandable one. Someone is asked to mentor because of their experience, so they arrive at the first meeting prepared to share it. Forty minutes later they have given a good account of their own career and learned almost nothing about the person opposite.
A useful discipline for the first conversation: ask more questions than you answer, and resist the first three opportunities to offer a solution. What the mentee needs early on is not your conclusion. It is the reasoning that got you there, which they can only get at by asking.
Beyond that, the mentoring techniques that hold up are unglamorous. Agree what is confidential at the outset. Let the mentee set the agenda, and hold them to having one. Be specific about what you are seeing rather than encouraging in general terms - vague reassurance is pleasant and useless. And end the relationship deliberately when it has run its course, rather than letting it dissolve.
Mentors also need somewhere to take their own questions. A mentor who is out of their depth and has nobody to ask will usually withdraw rather than escalate, and the mentee will read that withdrawal as a judgement about them.
Back to the top
Measuring a mentoring programme
Satisfaction scores are the easiest thing to collect and the least useful thing to act on. People report enjoying mentoring almost regardless of whether it changed anything.
The measures that tell you something:
Match rate. What proportion of registered mentees found a suitable mentor. This is the first point of failure and the one most programmes never quantify.
First-meeting rate. How many matched pairs actually met. The gap between matched and met is where programmes die quietly.
Completion. How many relationships ran their agreed course rather than fading.
Goal attainment. Only meaningful if goals were set at the start, which is an argument for setting them.
Retention and progression delta. Participants against a comparable non-participant group. The hardest to produce and the most persuasive to a board.
For benchmarking, the match rates reported across PLD programmes give a usable range: 99% at alta, 76% of profile-completing mentees at the Royal College of Midwives, 75% at Barts Health NHS Trust, and 52 connections from 71 registered mentees at the Royal Academy of Engineering. A programme matching below about three-quarters of its mentees has a design problem, not a demand problem.
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland
ICAS launched in February 2022 and passed 300 mentees and 190 mentors. Member Engagement Manager Suzanne Ezzi highlights daily and weekly performance tracking - not to report upwards, but to see which marketing activity is actually driving registrations, and adjust while it still matters.
Measurement is also what turns a programme from an initiative into a fixture. CIAT is in its eighth year and describes the programme as largely self-managing - a position no organisation reaches without knowing, year on year, that it is working.
Back to the top
Common questions about workplace mentoring
What is a mentoring programme in the workplace?
A workplace mentoring programme is an organised system for pairing colleagues in developmental relationships, with defined purpose, matching criteria, preparation and duration. It differs from informal mentoring in that the organisation takes responsibility for who is matched with whom, and for knowing whether it worked.
Should an employee's manager be their mentor?
Usually not. A manager can coach, give feedback and support progression, but they are accountable for the employee's output - which is precisely what stops most people raising the things mentoring is for. Keeping the two separate is what makes candour possible.
Why would you establish a mentoring programme for your employees?
Most organisations start one to address a specific problem: retention in a particular group, knowledge that will leave with a retiring cohort, or a progression pipeline that narrows too early. Mentoring works on all three because it moves the kind of understanding that training courses cannot transmit.
What is the purpose of a mentoring programme?
The purpose should be decided before the programme is designed, because it determines the matching criteria, the population, the duration and the measures. A programme without a stated purpose usually ends up serving whoever volunteers most enthusiastically, which is rarely the group that needed it.
Why are mentoring programmes important?
They address a gap that no other development activity covers. Training transfers explicit knowledge and line management drives performance, but neither gives someone a candid, unaccountable relationship in which to think out loud about their own progress.
How do you introduce mentoring in the workplace?
Start narrow. Define one population, recruit mentors before mentees, prepare both sides, and run a first cohort small enough to learn from. Organisations that launch across the whole workforce at once tend to spend the first year firefighting matching problems rather than improving the design.
How long should a workplace mentoring relationship last?
Six to twelve months, meeting every four to six weeks, suits most career mentoring. Shorter works for specific questions, longer for sponsorship-style relationships. What matters more than the length is agreeing it in advance, so the relationship has a proper ending rather than a slow fade.
Back to the top
Where to start
The fourteen pairs and the abandoned spreadsheet are not an argument against mentoring. They are an argument against starting one without deciding what it is for. Organisations that answer that question first - and then match, prepare and measure against it - are the ones still running programmes eight years later. If you are weighing up whether to build one, our case studies set out what that has looked like in professional bodies, the NHS, corporates and charities, and you are welcome to book a demonstration if it would help to see the mechanics.
Organisations running coaching alongside mentoring may also want to look at PLD's coaching platform, which is built on the same foundation but configured for coaching relationships, and at how mentoring supports new employees specifically during onboarding.
